AD Continua or ... Drambo?
I was about to purchase yet another AUv3 synth but after watching videos demoing Continua, I said to myself: No. Got Drambo already.
This is my model of one of its oscillators, aiming at offering much variety with simplest controls:
Comments
Nice Patch :) Been working on something kinda similar here with the XY’s...
sounds fantastic! what's going on in that patch?
Things like this patch would be much more useable in Drambo with some tweaks to XY @giku .... currently p-Locks and Scene fader are kind of a mess with XY...
If we p-lock an XY value to scene or step, the XY gui will then show this new XY coordinate, even when we leave that scene/step ... in other modules the locked param values only display when we hold the step/scene...
And XY are the only p-locks/scene locks that we can’t clear by double-tap...
So atm we can make these nice patches with minimised controls but they’re confusing/awkward when we start to use them with Drambo’s core features.
It's actually the same as in Continua - basic waveforms re-shaped thanks to @giku's new wavetable effects.
sounds great - and important reminder/inspiration to try to use what i've got and/or build-my-own in drambo instead of buying shiny things that i probably don't need